Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms Radeon 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 3197 days older than Radeon 680M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 204% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Radeon 680M - 85 vs 28 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Radeon 680M - 19 vs 50 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
Navi II IGP | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 1 GB |
System-Shared | Type | DDR3 |
System-Shared | Bus | 64-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |