Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms Radeon 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 6900 XT is 797 days older than Radeon 680M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT - 50 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Performs up to 281% better in Starfield than Radeon 680M - 61 vs 16 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
FPS
61
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310637 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
24.444444444444446%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
14.666666666666666%
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
Navi II IGP | Generation | Navi II |
Not Available | MSRP | $999 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 16 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR6 |
System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1825 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |