Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1351 days older than Radeon 680M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 11% better in Valheim than Radeon 680M - 68 vs 61 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
68
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$154.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309976 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
75.68181818181817%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
88.29545454545455%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Navi II IGP | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |