Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 70 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 11% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - $138.29 vs $154.99
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 65 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 33% better in Battlefield 2042 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 64 vs 48 FPS
- Up to 16% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - $2.42 vs $2.88 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
48
75%
Value, $/FPS
$2.88/FPS
84.02777777777779%
Price, $
$138.29
100%
Buy for $138.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 314918 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
64
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$154.99
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 314918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
38.888888888888886%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
44.44444444444444%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$199 | MSRP | $149 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |