Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms Radeon Pro W6600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 2623 days older than Radeon Pro W6600.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Radeon Pro W6600 - 78 vs 73 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6600 - 19 vs 100 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 8 vs 1 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Radeon Pro W6600
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
1.5142337976983646%
Texel Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
1.7301038062283738%
Radeon Pro W6600
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
165.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
289 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 230 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 8th, 2021 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 10.67 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| 625 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2580 MHz |
| 667 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
