Key Differences
In short — Radeon 680M outperforms Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon 680M is 3374 days newer than Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than AMD Radeon 680M - 30 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Performs up to 51% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Radeon R7 240 - 53 vs 35 FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
35
66.0377358490566%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 321685 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
7.954545454545453%
Texel Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
13.257575757575758%
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 240 | vs | AMD Radeon 680M |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II IGP |
$69 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Integrated |
2 GB | Memory | System-Shared |
GDDR5 | Type | System-Shared |
128-bit | Bus | System-Shared |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | System-Shared |
650 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2200 MHz |
1150 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | System-Shared |