Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R7 240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 78% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - $29.99 vs $138.29
- Up to 75% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - $0.65 vs $2.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 30 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 15% better in Monster Hunter: World than Radeon R7 240 - 53 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 4 vs 2 GB
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
46
86.79245283018868%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312444 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
53
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.61/FPS
24.904214559386975%
Price, $
$138.29
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $138.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312444 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
27.027027027027028%
Texel Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
33.78378378378378%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 240 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$69 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
650 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1150 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |