Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A750 is 3291 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 88% cheaper than Arc A750 - $29.99 vs $239.99
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 30 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 5400% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon R7 240 - 55 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 85% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon R7 240 - $4.36 vs $29.99 per FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 8 vs 2 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
1
1.8181818181818181%
Value, $/FPS
$29.99/FPS
14.538179393131045%
Price, $
$29.99
100%
Buy for $29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312260 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$239.99
12%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312258 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
2.083333333333333%
Texel Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
2.6041666666666665%
AMD Radeon R7 240 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
$69 | MSRP | $289 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
650 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1150 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |