Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Radeon R7 240 outperforms the more expensive GeForce GT 630 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Radeon R7 240 is 511 days newer than the more expensive GeForce GT 630.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 73% cheaper than GeForce GT 630 - $29.99 vs $109.98
- Up to 73% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GT 630 - $29.99 vs $109.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 - 30 vs 65 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 - 2 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$29.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312451 minutes ago
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
FPS
1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$109.98/FPS
27.268594289870883%
Price, $
$109.98
27%
Buy for $109.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312450 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
3.24 GPixel/s
57.85714285714286%
Texel Fillrate
12.96 GTexel/s
92.57142857142858%
AMD Radeon R7 240 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | May 15th, 2012 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 600 |
$69 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
650 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 810 MHz |
700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1150 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |