Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R7 240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 81% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - $29.99 vs $154.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing Dirt 5 than GeForce GTX 1650 - $0.35 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 30 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 26% better in Dirt 5 than Radeon R7 240 - 107 vs 85 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 4 vs 2 GB
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
85
79.43925233644859%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312249 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
107
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
24.137931034482758%
Price, $
$154.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312247 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
10.51051051051051%
Texel Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
15.015015015015015%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 240 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$69 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
650 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1150 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |