Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce RTX 2060 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce RTX 2060 is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Up to 50% cheaper than GeForce RTX 2060 - $116.51 vs $230.98
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 55 vs 160 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Performs up to 109% better in Elden Ring than Radeon R7 250 - 71 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Elden Ring than Radeon R7 250 - $3.25 vs $3.43 per FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 6 vs 1 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
34
47.88732394366197%
Value, $/FPS
$3.43/FPS
94.75218658892129%
Price, $
$116.51
100%
Buy for $116.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309973 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2019
FPS
71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$230.98
50%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $230.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309971 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
18.353174603174605%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
14.682539682539684%
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
80.64 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
201.6 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Not Available | MSRP | $349 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1365 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1680 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |