Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6600M outperforms Radeon R9 Nano on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 6600M is 2104 days newer than Radeon R9 Nano.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6600M
- Performs up to 29% better in World of Tanks than Radeon R9 Nano - 207 vs 161 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 100 vs 175 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 8 vs 4 GB
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Radeon RX 6600M
Mobile • May 31st, 2021
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
41.39715394566624%
Texel Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
94.60458240946045%
Radeon RX 6600M
Mobile • May 31st, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
154.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
270.6 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | May 31st, 2021 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Navi Mobile |
| $649 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| HBM | Type | GDDR6 |
| 4096-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| 1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2068 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2416 MHz |
| 500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
