Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 Nano on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 2343 days newer than Radeon R9 Nano.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 143% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Radeon R9 Nano - 102 vs 42 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 115 vs 175 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 16 vs 4 GB
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Jan 25th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
52.892561983471076%
Texel Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
87.58125213821415%
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Jan 25th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
121 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
292.3 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 Mobile |
| $649 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
| HBM | Type | GDDR6 |
| 4096-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 810 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1260 MHz |
| 500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
