Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the more expensive Radeon RX 460 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 928 days newer than the more expensive Radeon RX 460.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 460
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 75 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 85% better in God of War than Radeon RX 460 - 61 vs 33 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Radeon RX 460 - $145.42 vs $172.02
- Up to 54% better value when playing God of War than Radeon RX 460 - $2.38 vs $5.21 per FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon RX 460 - 6 vs 2 GB
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 8th, 2016
FPS
33
54.09836065573771%
Value, $/FPS
$5.21/FPS
45.68138195777351%
Price, $
$172.02
84%
Buy for $172.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 315107 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
61
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $145.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 315106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 8th, 2016
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 8th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
22.598870056497177%
Texel Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
39.55267804590935%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon RX 460 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Aug 8th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Arctic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1090 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |