Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R5 240 OEM is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Arc A750 is 3267 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 24% better in War Thunder than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 257 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 77% cheaper than Arc A750 - $54.99 vs $239.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing War Thunder than Arc A750 - $0.27 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 50 vs 225 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
257
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
29.03225806451613%
Price, $
$239.99
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310023 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
FPS
207
80.54474708171206%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$54.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $54.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310025 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
2.3214285714285716%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
3.4821428571428568%
Intel Arc A750 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
Alchemist | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$289 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
2050 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 730 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 780 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |