Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A750 is 3291 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 171% better in Elden Ring than Radeon R7 250 - 92 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 24% better value when playing Elden Ring than Radeon R7 250 - $2.61 vs $3.43 per FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 8 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Up to 51% cheaper than Arc A750 - $116.51 vs $239.99
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 55 vs 225 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
92
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$239.99
48%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309916 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
34
36.95652173913043%
Value, $/FPS
$3.43/FPS
76.09329446064139%
Price, $
$116.51
100%
Buy for $116.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
5.5059523809523805%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
5.5059523809523805%
Intel Arc A750 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
Alchemist | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$289 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
2050 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |