Key Differences
In short — Arc A770 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GT 220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Arc A770 is 4642 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of Intel Arc A770
- Performs up to 228% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce GT 220 - 128 vs 39 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 16 vs 1 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Up to 93% cheaper than Arc A770 - $59.96 vs $859.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Arc A770 - $1.54 vs $6.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Arc A770 - 58 vs 225 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.72/FPS
22.916666666666668%
Price, $
$859.99
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $859.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309621 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
FPS
39
30.46875%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
1.5625%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
2.34375%
Intel Arc A770 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2010 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 200 |
$329 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR3 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 22.4 GB/s |
2100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 600 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 700 MHz |