Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce 210 outperforms the more expensive GeForce GT 520 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce 210 is 548 days older than the more expensive GeForce GT 520.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GT 520 - 33 vs 31 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than GeForce GT 520 - $35.99 vs $129.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Elden Ring than GeForce GT 520 - $1.09 vs $4.16 per FPS
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 29 vs 31 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 1 vs 0 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
FPS
33
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$35.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $35.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310086 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
FPS
31
93.93939393939394%
Value, $/FPS
$4.16/FPS
26.201923076923077%
Price, $
$129
27%
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310085 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
64.19753086419753%
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
77.88461538461539%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 210 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2011 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 500 |
Not Available | MSRP | $59 |
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.5 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
DDR3 | Type | DDR3 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
520 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 810 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |