Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A770 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A770 is 4642 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Up to 93% cheaper than Arc A770 - $59.96 vs $859.99
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Arc A770 - 58 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A770
- Performs up to 5900% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GT 220 - 60 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 76% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GT 220 - $14.33 vs $59.96 per FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 16 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
FPS
1
1.6666666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$59.96/FPS
23.899266177451633%
Price, $
$59.96
100%
Buy for $59.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313033 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
60
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$859.99
6%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $859.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313031 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
1.5625%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
2.34375%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | Intel Arc A770 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $329 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2100 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |