Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7600 outperforms GeForce GT 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7600 is 5007 days newer than GeForce GT 240.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Radeon PRO W7600 - 69 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7600
- Performs up to 228% better in God of War than GeForce GT 240 - 82 vs 25 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 - 8 vs 1 GB
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 240
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009
Radeon PRO W7600
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 240
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
4.4 GPixel/s
2.8169014084507045%
Texel Fillrate
17.6 GTexel/s
5.635606788344541%
Radeon PRO W7600
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | vs | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
$80 | MSRP | $599 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 54.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| 550 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1720 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2440 MHz |
| 850 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
