Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7600 outperforms GeForce GT 425M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7600 is 4717 days newer than GeForce GT 425M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Radeon PRO W7600 - 23 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7600
- Performs up to 48% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than GeForce GT 425M - 83 vs 56 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M - 8 vs 1 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 425M
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2010
Radeon PRO W7600
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 425M
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
2.24 GPixel/s
1.4340588988476315%
Texel Fillrate
8.96 GTexel/s
2.869036183157221%
Radeon PRO W7600
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | vs | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
| GeForce 400M | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
| Not Available | MSRP | $599 |
| None | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 25.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| 560 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1720 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2440 MHz |
| 800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
