Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6650M XT outperforms GeForce GTS 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 6650M XT is 4689 days newer than GeForce GTS 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT
- Performs up to 114% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GTS 250 - 79 vs 37 FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 120 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 8 vs 1 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GeForce GTS 250
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Radeon RX 6650M XT
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTS 250
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
10.8 GPixel/s
6.985769728331177%
Texel Fillrate
43.2 GTexel/s
13.971539456662354%
Radeon RX 6650M XT
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
154.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
309.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Navi Mobile |
| $199 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 2x DVI | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| 675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2068 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2416 MHz |
| 1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
