Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTS 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is 5053 days newer than GeForce GTS 250.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Performs up to 393% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than GeForce GTS 250 - 69 vs 14 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 50 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 6 vs 1 GB
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GeForce GTS 250
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTS 250
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
10.8 GPixel/s
12.820512820512823%
Texel Fillrate
43.2 GTexel/s
30.76923076923077%
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
84.24 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
140.4 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
| $199 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 2x DVI | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 1 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 96-bit |
| 64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
| 675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1455 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1755 MHz |
| 1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
