Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 2204 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 76% better in Immortals of Aveum than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 37 vs 21 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 19 vs 30 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
6.944444444444445%
Texel Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
6.944444444444445%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
| 1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |
