Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is 993 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile - 30 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Performs up to 32% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 103 vs 78 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 6 vs 4 GB
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
42.73504273504274%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
51.28205128205128%
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
84.24 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
140.4 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 96-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1455 MHz |
1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1755 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |