Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 2204 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 29% better in Rust than GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 126 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 19 vs 50 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
5.156765676567657%
Texel Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
5.156765676567657%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
| 1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |
