Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 70 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 6% better in FIFA 23 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 149 vs 140 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 11% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - $138.29 vs $154.99
- Up to 5% better value when playing FIFA 23 than GeForce GTX 1650 - $0.99 vs $1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 65 vs 75 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
95.1923076923077%
Price, $
$154.99
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 314871 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
140
93.95973154362416%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $138.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 314872 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
38.888888888888886%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
44.44444444444444%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$149 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |