Buy on Amazon
$154.99
In Stock
Boost Clock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $149
Buy on Amazon
$159.99
In Stock
Boost Clock
Buy on Amazon
$236.95
In Stock
Same as Founder's Edition
Buy on Amazon
$174.99
In Stock
Same as Founder's Edition
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Buy on Amazon
$544.18
In Stock
Same as Founder's Edition
Buy on Amazon
$429.99
In Stock
Boost Clock
Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 588 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 72% cheaper than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti - $154.99 vs $544.18
- Up to 42% better value when playing God of War than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti - $3.44 vs $5.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti - 75 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Performs up to 104% better in God of War than GeForce GTX 1650 - 92 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
45
48.91304347826087%
Value, $/FPS
$3.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$154.99
100%
Value Winner
MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OCV3)
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 315578 minutes ago
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2020
FPS
92
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.91/FPS
58.206429780033844%
Price, $
$544.18
28%
FPS Winner
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition 8GB GDDR6 PCI Express 4.0 Graphics Card
Buy for $544.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 315577 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2020
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
40%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
36.83919399446859%
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2020 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | GeForce 30 |
$149 | MSRP | $399 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 12-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1410 MHz |
| 1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
Builds Using GeForce GTX 1650 or GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
God of War, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
82 FPS
$14.63/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Core i5-12600K
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,199.99
In Stock
78 FPS
$14.1/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Ryzen 9 5950X
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,099.99
In Stock
69 FPS
$23.19/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,599.99
In Stock
77 FPS
$16.88/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Ryzen 5 5600X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,299.99
In Stock
31 FPS
$20.81/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-12400F
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$645
In Stock
77 FPS
$15.58/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Core i7-11700F
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,199.99
In Stock
22 FPS
$43.18/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i7-10700
64 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$949.99
In Stock
78 FPS
$14.52/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Core i5-12400F
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,132.54
In Stock
81 FPS
$13.58/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Core i7-12700F
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,099.99
In Stock
20 FPS
$38.95/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-10400F
16 GB, 256 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$779
In Stock
Similar GPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
