Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1963 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 28% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon R7 250 - 73 vs 57 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon R7 250 - $1.99 vs $2.04 per FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 6 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Up to 20% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - $116.51 vs $145.42
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 55 vs 120 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
73
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145.42
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $145.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241490 minutes ago
Buy for $116.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241491 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$279 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |