Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q outperforms GeForce MX330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q is 377 days older than GeForce MX330.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 10 vs 80 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Performs up to 3100% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce MX330 - 32 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX330 - 8 vs 2 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Mobile • Jan 29th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jan 29th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
70.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
201.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 29th, 2019 |
GeForce MX | Generation | GeForce 20 Mobile |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | None |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
2 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
1531 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 735 MHz |
1594 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1095 MHz |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |