Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms GeForce MX350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is 1058 days newer than GeForce MX350.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile - 20 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Performs up to 154% better in Starfield than GeForce MX350 - 33 vs 13 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX350 - 6 vs 2 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce MX350
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
GeForce MX350
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
14.99 GPixel/s
17.79439696106363%
Texel Fillrate
29.98 GTexel/s
21.35327635327635%
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
84.24 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
140.4 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 96-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
| 747 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1455 MHz |
| 937 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1755 MHz |
| 1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
