Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Razer Blade 15 Base outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF F15 144Hz on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop
- Up to 18% cheaper than Razer Blade 15 Base - $819.0 vs $999.0
Advantages of Razer Blade 15 Base Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 283% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - 23 vs 6 FPS
- Up to 68% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - $43.43 vs $136.5 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $819 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 365306 minutes ago
Dec 7th, 2020 • 5th Variation
FPS
23
100%
Value, $/FPS
$43.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$999
81%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 365307 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
4th Variation
Dec 7th, 2020 • 5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
63%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
63%
Dec 7th, 2020 • 5th Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i5-10300H
2.5 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1369
94%
Multi-Core
4008
74%
Dec 7th, 2020 • 5th Variation
Core i7-10750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1446
100%
Multi-Core
5396
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | Razer Blade 15 Base Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Dec 7th, 2020 |
Core i5-10300H | CPU | Core i7-10750H |
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile |
8 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 256 GB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |