Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MSI GF63 Thin 11UC outperforms the more expensive Asus TUF 17.3” 144Hz FHD on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI GF63 Thin 11UC Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 47% better in No Man's Sky than Asus TUF 17.3” 144Hz FHD - 69 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Asus TUF 17.3” 144Hz FHD - $750.0 vs $799.99
- Up to 36% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Asus TUF 17.3” 144Hz FHD - $10.87 vs $17.02 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
47
68%
Value, $/FPS
$17.02/FPS
63%
Price, $
$799.99
93%
Buy for $799.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 365033 minutes ago
FPS
69
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$750
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $750 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 365042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
87%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
69%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 5 4600H
3.0 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1357
74%
Multi-Core
5046
79%
Asus TUF Gaming 17.3” 144Hz FHD Laptop | vs | MSI GF63 Thin 11UC Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 4600H | CPU | Core i5-11400H |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
