Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MSI GF63 Thin 11UC outperforms the more expensive Asus TUF 17.3” 144Hz FHD on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI GF63 Thin 11UC Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 380% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Asus TUF 17.3” 144Hz FHD - 24 vs 5 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Asus TUF 17.3” 144Hz FHD - $750.0 vs $859.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Asus TUF 17.3” 144Hz FHD - $31.25 vs $172.0 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
4th Variation
FPS
5
20%
Value, $/FPS
$172/FPS
18%
Price, $
$859.99
87%
Buy for $859.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 365360 minutes ago
FPS
24
100%
Value, $/FPS
$31.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$750
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $750 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 365368 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
87%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
69%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Ryzen 5 4600H
3.0 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1357
74%
Multi-Core
5046
79%
Asus TUF Gaming 17.3” 144Hz FHD Laptop | vs | MSI GF63 Thin 11UC Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 4600H | CPU | Core i5-11400H |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
