Key Differences
In short — SAMSUNG Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16" 3K AMOLED outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF 17.3” 144Hz FHD on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF 17.3” 144Hz FHD is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming 17.3” 144Hz FHD Laptop
- Up to 64% cheaper than SAMSUNG Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16" 3K AMOLED - $859.99 vs $2388.94
- Up to 33% better value when playing Minecraft than SAMSUNG Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16" 3K AMOLED - $2.35 vs $3.5 per FPS
Advantages of SAMSUNG Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16" 3K AMOLED Laptop
- Performs up to 87% better in Minecraft than Asus TUF 17.3” 144Hz FHD - 683 vs 366 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
4th Variation
FPS
366
53.58711566617862%
Value, $/FPS
$2.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$859.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $859.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445455 minutes ago
FPS
683
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.5/FPS
67.14285714285715%
Price, $
$2388.94
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,388.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
59.587020648967545%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
39.72142564522736%
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Ryzen 5 4600H
3.0 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1357
50%
Multi-Core
5046
30.71959089248752%
Asus TUF Gaming 17.3” 144Hz FHD Laptop | vs | SAMSUNG Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16" 3K AMOLED Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 4600H | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
