Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Lenovo LOQ outperforms the more expensive Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 55% better in Rust than Asus TUF A16 - 115 vs 74 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Asus TUF A16 - $1304.56 vs $1479.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing Rust than Asus TUF A16 - $11.34 vs $19.99 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $1,479 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 366941 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
115
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1304.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,304.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 366940 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
2nd Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
64%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
73%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
72%
Multi-Core
7887
53%
2nd Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| Radeon RX 7600S | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
