Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MSI GF63 outperforms the more expensive ASUS TUF A17 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI GF63 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 300% better in Starfield than ASUS TUF A17 - 4 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than ASUS TUF A17 - $769.99 vs $1059.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing Starfield than ASUS TUF A17 - $192.5 vs $1059.0 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
1
25%
Value, $/FPS
$1059/FPS
18.17752596789424%
Price, $
$1059
72%
Buy for $1,059 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 444150 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
4
100%
Value, $/FPS
$192.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$769.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $769.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 444154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
87.21122112211222%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
69.7710396039604%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 5 4600H
3.0 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1357
74.64246424642465%
Multi-Core
5046
79.67787778304121%
3rd Variation
Core i5-11400H
2.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1818
100%
Multi-Core
6333
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF Gaming A17 Laptop | vs | MSI GF63 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 4600H | CPU | Core i5-11400H |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
