Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MSI GF63 outperforms the more expensive ASUS TUF A17 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI GF63 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 63% better in Counter-Strike 2 than ASUS TUF A17 - 197 vs 121 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than ASUS TUF A17 - $859.99 vs $919.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than ASUS TUF A17 - $4.37 vs $7.6 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
FPS
121
61.42131979695431%
Value, $/FPS
$7.6/FPS
57.50000000000001%
Price, $
$919
93%
Buy for $919 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445204 minutes ago
5th Variation
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$859.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $859.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
87.21122112211222%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
69.7710396039604%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 4600H
3.0 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1357
74.64246424642465%
Multi-Core
5046
79.67787778304121%
5th Variation
Core i5-11400H
2.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1818
100%
Multi-Core
6333
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF Gaming A17 Laptop | vs | MSI GF63 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 4600H | CPU | Core i5-11400H |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
