Key Differences
In short — ASUS Vivobook 16X FHD outperforms the cheaper Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14-inch WUXGA 165Hz, 512GB SSD, i7-12700H on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14-inch WUXGA 165Hz, 512GB SSD, i7-12700H is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook 16X FHD Laptop
- Performs up to 31% better in Rust than Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14-inch WUXGA 165Hz, 512GB SSD, i7-12700H - 115 vs 88 FPS
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14-inch WUXGA 165Hz, 512GB SSD, i7-12700H Gaming Laptop
- Up to 30% cheaper than ASUS Vivobook 16X FHD - $950.0 vs $1359.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Rust than ASUS Vivobook 16X FHD - $10.8 vs $11.82 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FPS
115
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.82/FPS
91.37055837563453%
Price, $
$1359
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445017 minutes ago
FPS
88
76.52173913043478%
Value, $/FPS
$10.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$950
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $950 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445022 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75.3968253968254%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94.26681367144431%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ASUS Vivobook 16X FHD Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14-inch WUXGA 165Hz, 512GB SSD, i7-12700H Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 14" |
