Key Differences
In short — ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED outperforms the cheaper MSI Pulse GF66 15.6" 240Hz FHD on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MSI Pulse GF66 15.6" 240Hz FHD is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MSI Pulse GF66 15.6" 240Hz FHD Gaming Laptop
- Up to 18% cheaper than ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED - $1399.0 vs $1699.99
- Up to 13% better value when playing Starfield than ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED - $43.72 vs $50.0 per FPS
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED Laptop
- Performs up to 6% better in Starfield than MSI Pulse GF66 15.6" 240Hz FHD - 34 vs 32 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
32
94.11764705882352%
Value, $/FPS
$43.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1399
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 439852 minutes ago
May 3rd, 2023
FPS
34
100%
Value, $/FPS
$50/FPS
87.44%
Price, $
$1699.99
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 439856 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
135.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
259.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
May 3rd, 2023
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
67.00147710487444%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
69.93060909791828%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 3rd, 2023
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
MSI Pulse GF66 15.6" 240Hz FHD Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | May 3rd, 2023 |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
