Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Rendering Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H Desktop PC
- Up to 85% cheaper than ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Rendering Modelling Workstation - $699.0 vs $4799.99
Advantages of ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Rendering Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 609% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H - 326 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H - $14.72 vs $15.2 per FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Feb 3rd, 2020
FPS
46
14.11042944785276%
Value, $/FPS
$15.2/FPS
96.8421052631579%
Price, $
$699
100%
Buy for $699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 434056 minutes ago
FPS
326
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$4799.99
14%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $4,799.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 434060 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Feb 3rd, 2020
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 3rd, 2020
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
12.013528748590756%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
7.227906976744186%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 3rd, 2020
Core i5-9400F
2.9 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1378
52.59541984732824%
Multi-Core
4834
31.29815474263516%
Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H Desktop PC | vs | ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Rendering Modelling Workstation Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 3rd, 2020 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-9400F | CPU | Core i9-12900K |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 8 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 4 TB HDD |
