Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H Desktop PC
- Up to 86% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation - $699.0 vs $5099.99
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation Computer PC
- Performs up to 1500% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H - 144 vs 9 FPS
- Up to 54% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H - $35.42 vs $77.67 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Feb 3rd, 2020
FPS
9
6.25%
Value, $/FPS
$77.67/FPS
45.60319299600876%
Price, $
$699
100%
Buy for $699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 434052 minutes ago
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$35.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$5099.99
13%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $5,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 434047 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Feb 3rd, 2020
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 3rd, 2020
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
12.013528748590756%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
7.227906976744186%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 3rd, 2020
Core i5-9400F
2.9 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1378
62.95111923252627%
Multi-Core
4834
39.75655892754338%
Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 3rd, 2020 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-9400F | CPU | Ryzen 9 5950X |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 8 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 4 TB HDD |
