Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU outperforms the cheaper Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU is 788 days newer than the cheaper Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H.
Advantages of Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H Desktop PC
- Up to 22% cheaper than Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU - $699.0 vs $899.99
Advantages of Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 133% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H - 21 vs 9 FPS
- Up to 45% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H - $42.86 vs $77.67 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Feb 3rd, 2020
FPS
9
42.857142857142854%
Value, $/FPS
$77.67/FPS
55.182181022273724%
Price, $
$699
100%
Buy for $699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 434181 minutes ago
FPS
21
100%
Value, $/FPS
$42.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$899.99
77%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 434185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Feb 3rd, 2020
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 3rd, 2020
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
93.70383397819205%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
65.56962025316456%
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 3rd, 2020
Core i5-9400F
2.9 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1378
95.82753824756607%
Multi-Core
4834
84.05494696574509%
Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H Desktop PC | vs | Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 3rd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2022 |
| Core i5-9400F | CPU | Core i5-10400F |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
| 8 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
