Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper Acer Nitro 50 N50 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Acer Nitro 50 N50 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 83% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $929.0 vs $5399.99
- Up to 29% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $14.52 vs $20.53 per FPS
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 311% better in Dirt 5 than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - 263 vs 64 FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
3rd Variation
FPS
64
24.334600760456272%
Value, $/FPS
$14.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$929
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 433640 minutes ago
FPS
263
100%
Value, $/FPS
$20.53/FPS
70.72576716999512%
Price, $
$5399.99
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $5,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 433629 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
12.013528748590756%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
7.227906976744186%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
73.67182246133154%
Multi-Core
8910
44.22275163787969%
Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 6 TB HDD |
