Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper MSI Codex R on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MSI Codex R is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 42% better in War Thunder than MSI Codex R - 288 vs 203 FPS
Advantages of MSI Codex R Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 71% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $999.0 vs $3399.99
- Up to 58% better value when playing War Thunder than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $4.92 vs $11.81 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
FPS
288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.81/FPS
41.65961049957663%
Price, $
$3399.99
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 433033 minutes ago
5th Variation
FPS
203
70.48611111111111%
Value, $/FPS
$4.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$999
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 433031 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
42.088382038488945%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
31.0177281680893%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
79.42165433759247%
Multi-Core
11527
57.21163390907286%
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | MSI Codex R Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD |
