Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper ViprTech Overlord 2.0 Liquid-Cooled on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ViprTech Overlord 2.0 Liquid-Cooled is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 50% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ViprTech Overlord 2.0 Liquid-Cooled - 197 vs 131 FPS
Advantages of ViprTech Overlord 2.0 Liquid-Cooled PC
- Up to 58% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $1424.99 vs $3399.99
- Up to 37% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $10.88 vs $17.26 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.26/FPS
63.03592120509849%
Price, $
$3399.99
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 432855 minutes ago
FPS
131
66.49746192893402%
Value, $/FPS
$10.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1424.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,424.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 432853 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
56.45046329294369%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
59.803020354563365%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | ViprTech Overlord 2.0 Liquid-Cooled PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
