Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper Centaurus Andromeda A1 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Centaurus Andromeda A1 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 252% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Centaurus Andromeda A1 - 222 vs 63 FPS
Advantages of Centaurus Andromeda A1 Gaming Computer PC
- Up to 82% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $997.0 vs $5399.99
- Up to 35% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $15.83 vs $24.32 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$24.32/FPS
65.09046052631578%
Price, $
$5399.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $5,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 432842 minutes ago
FPS
63
28.37837837837838%
Value, $/FPS
$15.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$997
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $997 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 432849 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
12.820744081172492%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
11.023255813953488%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Centaurus Andromeda A1 Gaming Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-13900K | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
6 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |