Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper MSI Aegis RS on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MSI Aegis RS is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 116% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MSI Aegis RS - 222 vs 103 FPS
Advantages of MSI Aegis RS Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 69% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $1649.99 vs $5399.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $16.02 vs $24.32 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$24.32/FPS
65.87171052631578%
Price, $
$5399.99
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $5,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 432906 minutes ago
9th Variation
FPS
103
46.3963963963964%
Value, $/FPS
$16.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1649.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,649.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 480795 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
9th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
26.62908680947012%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
18.310077519379846%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
9th Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
88.50033624747815%
Multi-Core
14759
73.25292833035537%
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | MSI Aegis RS Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 6 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
