Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper MSI Codex R on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MSI Codex R is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 204% better in Starfield than MSI Codex R - 85 vs 28 FPS
Advantages of MSI Codex R Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 81% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $999.0 vs $5399.99
- Up to 44% better value when playing Starfield than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $35.68 vs $63.53 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$63.53/FPS
56.16244294034314%
Price, $
$5399.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $5,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 433897 minutes ago
5th Variation
FPS
28
32.94117647058823%
Value, $/FPS
$35.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$999
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 433898 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
26.62908680947012%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
18.310077519379846%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
79.42165433759247%
Multi-Core
11527
57.21163390907286%
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | MSI Codex R Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 6 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD |
