Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper CLX Set on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing CLX Set is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 326% better in World of Tanks than CLX Set - 592 vs 139 FPS
Advantages of CLX Set Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 83% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $919.99 vs $5499.99
- Up to 29% better value when playing World of Tanks than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $6.62 vs $9.29 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
592
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.29/FPS
71.25941872981701%
Price, $
$5499.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $5,499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 438178 minutes ago
9th Variation
FPS
139
23.47972972972973%
Value, $/FPS
$6.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$919.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $919.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 438186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
9th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
12.820744081172492%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
11.023255813953488%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
9th Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1871
62.91190316072629%
Multi-Core
7692
38.17748659916617%
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | CLX Set Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 500 GB SSD |
